| Lycaeum > Leda > Trip Reports > Four Views |
|
The New |
Four ViewsMore alphamethyltrypping Substances: AMT This is an account of a recent experience myself and 3 others had with a chemical called IT-290, or AMT (dl-alpha-methyltryptamine). This substance is currently not scheduled in the U.S. Before offering our personal experiences, I‚d like to include an excerpt from a paper which we used as part of our preparation. Our experiences follow this excerpt. ---BEGIN EXCERPT---
From:
Here's some clinical notes: Many people in Tampa have tried it and find it
preferable to LSD, not as heavy but still trippy and very euphoric. It lasts
a long time. Apparently one can focus and function fairly well on it in
doses less than 60-80 mg.
IT-290
dl-alpha-methyltryptamine
This is a heavily edited version of the following paper:
Rosenquist, N. (1960) Comparison of three psychotropic drugs (Psilocybin,
JB-329, and IT-290) in volunteer subjects. J Nerv Mental Dis 131:428-434
These notes are restricted to IT-290 as data on psilocybin is well
documented elsewhere; JB-329 is a synthetic with unpleasant effects similar
to atropine. If in any doubt always consult the original paper.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Having decided to study these two compounds [psilocybin, JB-329]
concurrently, we further decided to introduce a comparison drug. For this
purpose we chose IT-290 (dl-alpha-methyltryptamine), the indole analog of
amphetamine. Animal pharmacologic studies indicated some amphetamine like
properties, though IT-290 seemed appropriate as a comparison agent because
of its chemical relationship to psilocybin and pharmacologic effects
mimicking in part those of psychotomimetic agents.
Method of Study
IT-290 was administered in eight trials in as many subjects. All doses were
oral, ranging from 384 to 810 mcg/K. The volunteers were mostly graduate
students, their age varied between 22 and 44 years.
Trials were conducted on a medical ward of a psychiatric hospital. Subjects
were placed in a private room, small and austerely furnished. To minimize
the effects of external influence, subjects were visited by hospital
personnel only for obtaining clinical or laboratory data.
Two measures of mental function were used. One consisted of a series of
simple arithmetic problems (Number Facility test). The other consisted of
linear drawings, each comparing four lines which had to be copied from a
completed drawing (Flexibility of Closure). Subjects were also tested for
ability to estimate varying periods of time (5, 15, 30 and 60 seconds).
Results of Study
Clinical Syndrome
With IT-290, onset was slower than with psilocybin and effects were longer,
sometimes lasting over a 16-18 hour period. Direct stimulation was greater
than with psilocybin, early symptoms of jitteriness, restlessness and
anxiety being more pronounced. The visual effects, not often present were
slight. Mental function was little impaired. Somatic symptoms were greater
in number and degree than with psilocybin, many subjects complaining of
feeling ill for various reasons. With lower doses these effects could be
moderated without changing the general effect of the drug on mood. Except
for the somatic effects, the drug experience was considered to be pleasant,
though not as meaningful as with psilocybin.
Clinical and Biochemical Measures
IT-290 increased blood pressure and pulse rate beyond physiologic limits in
one subject who received a large dose of the drug and was the oldest subject
in the series. Dilation of the pupils was constant, averaging 3 mm. over a 2
hour period. Deep tendon reflexes were increased in seven trials. Impairment
of coordination tests was noted in two subjects. No changes were noted in
the remaining biochemical tests nor on the electroencephalograms, though a
decrease in total circulating eosinophils just missed statistical significance.
Psychometic Tests
IT-290 produced no significant changes on the Number facility test,
Flexibility of Closure test, or time estimates during the first 4 hour
period of drug administration as compared with the control measures. On the
Flexibility of Closure tests, both the number of lines attempted and
completed correctly showed a progressive increase during the first four
hours, but failed to reach significance.
Discussion
Distinct differences were noted between psilocybin and IT-290. Psilocybin
resembled LSD-25 and can properly be classified as a psychotometic agent.
IT-290 had a mood elevating effect similar to but stronger than
dextroamphetamine. A peculiar mixture of other effects was also noted. Most
patients complained of yawning, dreaminess, and lethargy despite the fact
that mental functions were not impaired. This aspect of the drug, as well as
some other somatic effects, were reminiscent of reserpine. Some of the
visual effects resembled those from LSD-25 though less frequent and much
milder. The long duration of action of IT-290 as compared with psilocybin
may be in part due to the larger dose used.
Psilocybin impaired motivation more than performance as the ratio of correct
responses to line drawings attempted remained constant even though the
number attempted was reduced. With IT-290 confidence was increased with more
drawings being attempted, although the ratio done correctly remained constant.
Each of these three drugs may prove to have therapeutic usefulness.
Psilocybin has already been used for facilitating psychotherapy. IT-290 may
be useful in similar fashion as well as an antidepressant.
Table 1
Clinical Syndromes for IT-290
0-30 Minutes Euphoria
30-120 Minutes Nausea, retching
120-240 Minutes Visual effects (blurring, apparent movement of objects,
4-12 Hours Visual effects (patterns, eyes closed)
Later Effects Continued stimulation, insomnia, fatigue, muscle aching,
Less Common Effects General malaise, salivation increased, paresthesia,
Table 2
Clinical and Biochemical Measures During 8 Trials with IT-290
Blood pressure 1 elevated
*n.s.d: no significant difference
Our group consisted of five individuals: A (male), B (female), C (male),
myself, and a Ground Control figure (female) who took notes for the first
two thirds of the main part of the experience before having to get some
sleep before work the next morning. All of us are experienced with a wide
range of psychedelics; none of us had tried AMT before this experience. The
first part of this report is a straight reporting of the physical sensations
as reported in our log; after that, I‚ve included first person
notes/accounts from all of us on the more subjective sensations we experienced.
9:00 pm - Oral ingestion of 40 mgs each, the solution dissolved in glasses
of juice.
9:26 pm - A, B and myself have begun feeling detached, floaty, smily. C is
still feeling relatively down to earth. We joke somewhat playfully about
being "ready to take more!" though of course we do not. Soon after, A and B
begin to report funny stomach feelings, though they suggest it may have
something to do with the strange pig samples in the Woob CD we‚re listening
to. This will turn out not to be the case.
9:38 pm - A and B are now feeling speedy effects and have sweaty palms. A
also comments that there is definitely something going on down there in his
stomach. C reports possible visuals. I now have an unsettled stomach as
well; I‚m feeling buzzed, and am noticing slight visual distortions. I‚m
also feeling hot; this will continue throughout the experience for me. I
sweated profusely throughout the entire experience, although the others
didn‚t seem to share that effect.
9:48 pm - C has begun to hear a high pitched tone in his head similar to the
tone he always hears when taking psilocybin or 2CB; it is, to him, the first
significant "alarm". B and myself both report disturbances in the visual
field, with me noting quite a disturbance in my depth perception; A still
has accurate depth perception. A and I are both yawning quite a bit, though
there‚s no hint whatsoever of tiredness.
9:52 pm - A is vomiting. He suggests that it may be the bad breakfast he
had earlier that day. B is now laying down, as it seems to help her nausea.
C is now experiencing both closed and open eye visuals. For me, the visuals
at this point have the flavor of psilocybin, though not the "content" as it
were. Around this point, we decide to light candles and dim the lamps - a
very good idea!
10:01 pm - B reports sensations similar to DMT, though doesn‚t get more
specific. I‚m feeling very smily at this point. Soon after, all 4 of us
have our eyes closed. GC reports that I am moaning lightly, rolling on the
floor, yawning; and I report feeling restless but inert. I note that I seem
to be "treading space." Both A and I report a mild and unsettling
psychedelic feeling, with A noticing that everything in general seems to be
fuzzy but objects in particular are crisp. He wishes he had vomited with
the lights on in the bathroom, now thinking it might have been beautiful as
on LSD. B comments that the whole thing feels like "psychedelic speed."
10:08 pm - C is now vomiting.
10:15 pm - Lots of laughter in the room. Another Woob CD is put on. The
whole experience is sort of revolving around the intersection of really
excellent music and the new space that the drug is opening up for us. A
comments that he "hasn‚t stepped into the Rolls Royce" but is definitely
enjoying the experience (Neil Cassady reportedly called AMT "the Rolls Royce
of psychedelics"). GC‚s question of the moment is: Is it worth the
vomiting? A and C report that it is, so far. A is not feeling the same
sort of dissociation that I am feeling; throughout, it seems to be the case
that it hit me a little harder than it hit A. B reports lots of visuals.
10:43 pm - Jaw clenching all around. I report a very dry mouth, and am very
much riding in the nausea-mobile. A is feeling overconfident, heh - says
that he could operate heavy machinery if he had to. He‚s basically
reporting that he doesn‚t feel his mental function to have been impaired. B
is quite chatty at this point.
11:01 pm - A is vomiting again. B and myself both report euphoria, and
feeling floaty and loungy. Laughter. I comment that the experience is very
sensual and not mental, and B agrees. C reports further nausea and jaw
clenching. The trip seems to be building for all of us. C and I both
report feeling multidimensional, as though we‚re phasing in and out of this
space, interacting with space. At this point, A comments that he feels he
could have gone for a higher dosage, that it‚s not an explosion or a kick in
the head but instead meanders. I reply that maybe this isn‚t a drug where
you *should* look for an explosion or a kick in the head. The "tryptamine"
in the chemical name might indicate a DMT like trip, but that ain‚t this.
11:20 pm - C reports that he is DOING GOOD!!! :)
There‚s a gap in the record, which was basically a "peak" plateau.
Vomiting/nausea finally dissipated, and we coasted for several hours,
enjoying the trip - our subjective comments below will speak more about the
character of this plateau, which constituted the "peak" of the experience.
A general comment about the plateua is that it was characterized by a strong
empathogenic feeling among the group. This empathogensis was given much
more "authority" by the tryptamine signature than the empathogensis of MDMA
tends to provide.
3:24 am - I report that for me, the euphoria is beginning to dissipate, and
I‚m in a transition from a relatively empathogenic tryptamine space into a
starkly psychedelic tryptamine space, though not particularly overwhelming
in any meaningful way. All along the way, we‚ve felt a strong sense of
synaesthesia, and I report an inability to read whatsoever (more on that
later) due to a kind of multidimensional blurring effect.
4:30 am - B now also reports that the euphoria is fading, though for her,
the empathogenic qualities are still present, alongside some very
psychedelic/hallucinogenic sensations.
4:57 am - A is able to eat again. It‚s Doritos, of course.
7:30 am - I‚m finally starting to get hints of my normal reading vision back
- quite a relief. I‚m also noticing a significant drop in intensity over
the last couple hours or so.
9:00 am - We are mostly "down", excepting residual visual
distortion/blurriness and some mild twitchy, jumpy restlessness. None of us
will actually sleep for many hours to come. I personally don‚t fall asleep
until 10:30 pm that night! (Others did get to sleep earlier, and I may have
been able to if I had tried properly.)
Subjective Experiences
A:
"It definitely lacked the going over the waterfall psychedelic experience.
This is not to say it was somehow inferior just different. On the whole it
was a very pleasant, mild, and LONG trip. I still felt noticeable effects at
the 9 or 10 hour point. I definitely got some useful work done but the pace
was slow and never rushed or uncomfortable.
"I would repeat this experience though probably with a higher dosage and
would probably skip breakfast :)
"I don't think I would put amt on my A list, but it was still a damn good time."
B:
"For a period of time after this i remained laying down with my eyes closed.
The closed eye visuals for me were not very intense, at times hardly even
noticeable, but closing my eyes was like looking into outer space without
the stars being there - i imagine it's what looking into the void might
look like but without being scared on accounta it's the void and all. In
fact, at no point during this entire experience did i feel scared, just a
little anxious initially during the nausea phase. Also - this drug did not
seem to affect (for better or for worse) my cognitive functioning. The same
was expressed by A to be the case. What i meant by that is that if the
phone rang i could have answered it (yes even if it was my mom) or if the
police showed up at the front door for whatever reason I felt confident that
i could've answered it and dealt with them in a rational manner without
freaking out - not that i wanted to mind you. Anyways, after having had my
eyes closed for a while i opened them and looked into a world that had gone
all psychedelic while i was closing my eyes. Visuals were very intense to
the point where at times i could not focus on anything in my visual field.
That's when i knew it was time to close my eyes again for a bit.
"Throughout the experience i had periods where i felt hot to the point of
opening windows then later would feel freezing, close windows and huddle up
in blankies and socks. i noticed the other zoomfolks were yawning a lot and
many of them said they get that when they do mushrooms but i dont get that
from mushrooms nor did i get anything like that from this substance. i
recall at one point i said the whole experience felt like 'psychedelic
speed' but it occurs to me now that the psychedelic state can have many
different flavors and that this particular psychedelic state seems to have
elements of many others. It had the sensuality and empathogenic qualities
of MDMA but not nearly as strongly or as in-your-face as MDMA can be. The
headspace it put me in was something akin to 2cb but with a tryptamine
'edge' to it, if you can imagine that. The energy it gave me was like a
mixture of MDMA, methamphetamine, and lsd. It certainly had an extremely
long duration, much like lsd, but after we had come down, sleeping for me
wasn't an option for several hours to come but it never got to that annoying
point lsd gets to where i *just* *want* *to* *sleep* *NOW*! i found that
once i had slept (a good 26 hours after taking this substance) that 8 hours
sufficed but that for several days after i found i needed at least 8-10
hours of sleep nightly and that i was pretty exhausted for several days
after - it felt much in the same way as after using mathamphetamine for
several days then stopping.
"Although i was awake for a good long time after being down, i found i had
no words to put to any of it, which makes this different from every other
psychedelic i have ever done.
"All in all i found alpha-methyl-tryptamine to be not only enjoyable (minus
the nausea) but useful as well in that the empathogenic qualities it
possesses are there and significantly affected the zoom but didn't
monopolize the experience - it was subtle. i think this could be useful (an
in fact during this zoom was useful) as it didn't overwhelm me and i
didn't get the feelings of grandiosity about how i love everyone SO much and
how i love the whole world SO much and how i love that pillow SO much and
that song - you
get the idea. The in-your-face-ness that MDMA has is useful, don't get me
wrong, i think MDMA is quite useful for forging connections with other
people (and re-affirming), but this substance seemed to be useful for
helping *fix* connections that may have broken down at some point. i think
this is a result of coupling the subtle euphoric and empathogenic qualities
of this substance with the
psychedelic-that-reminds-me-of-2cb-but-more-tryptaminey qualities
facilitated not only powerful introspection but it also aided in open and
honest and yes, loving communication. It almost seems like most aspects of
this drug were somewhat subtle, yet in combination, synergistic.
"i would definitely do this again...‚i loved it...better than Cats...i'll do
it again and again...‚"
C:
"Still, the onset was very familiar; I tend to stay grounded for quite a
long time, and this is exactly what happened. However, a bit after the
others reported feeling the effects I noticed the 'early entheogen warning'
I always get with both 2C-B and mushrooms, a high pitched tone, similar to
that of an old TV. Soon after that the nausea followed, and while I tried to
remind myself that it‚s all in my head soon enough I could taste it, and
realised that the little food I had taken earlier should have been avoided.
There wasn‚t much to throw up, but my stomach sure put in the effort. Nausea
continued to play a subtle part in the background, but didn‚t really bother
me as long I wasn't thinking about it.
"The whole experience had a very multidimensional character, in that I would
occasionally 'catch myself tripping' without being aware of it; this is a
reason to try a higher dosage at some point in the future, but it also makes
it a very comfortable tool to get some work done without being 'distracted'
in any way, until you actually take the time and be distracted. Was it
worth the nausea ? Definitely. I‚m very curious about both higher and lower
dosages of this substance, especialy since it didn‚t seem to have any of the
'noise' of low dosage mushrooms. (which I interpret as 'tripping parts of
the brain trying to communicate with parts that are still grounded‚).
Something which appeals to me even more is to follow up the AMT with some
mushrooms; I have a hard time getting the right mind set for mushrooms, but
I specifically think the very long coming down period of AMT seems like a
very good time to do a serious amount of mushrooms."
Me:
I tried juggling at several points throughout the experience, and never lost
my motor control such that I couldn‚t do it; however, it *did* get
significantly trippier as the evening went on, and harder to do. The
objects took on what I can only call multidimensional properties, in that I
seemed to be able to both see the objects and see through the objects at the
same time. My depth perception was way off all night long, and my balance
was obviously affected by that, though slightly; I could still walk, but
every time I stood up it took some getting used to again. Closed eye
visuals were a mix of psilocybin/DMT flavored images and geometries, but
without any of the "oomph" of those drugs. They were interesting, and they
were reminders that the whole space was being supported by some kind of
tryptamine energy, but they were never particularly intrusive. I could find
them when I wanted to, but most of the time, I didn‚t.
I loved the fact that the peak lasted for such a long time, and that the
peak was not so "confusing" or "abrasive" as, say, the peak is on LSD. My
perception of self was only slightly altered in a direct way by this;
rather, my perception of environment was *strongly* altered, and any further
changes to perception of self were as a result of the fun I was having
figuring out this new space and enjoying it. The only really disconcerting
effect of the AMT experience for me was the blurred vision: losing my
ability to read. That was a mildly powerful experience all unto itself.
When I noticed this feature during the euphoria, I properly contextualized
it as a result of the multidimensional nature of the experience; I had no
qualms about asking GC to read a CD case for me, for example. But as the
euphoria faded, it began to disturb me, this notion that I could write words
on a pad of paper and not be able to recognize them as they came out due to
too much blurring. Later on, it occured to me to try reading with only one
eye and then the other; each eye could read just fine on its own, but the
two eyes together just plain weren‚t cooperating. This didn‚t properly
"reset" until late in the day, and it was a slow, gradual process. In
retrospect, I should have taken the 1960 clinical report at its word when it
listed "blurring" as an effect!
The "inappropriate smiling" note in the 1960 report cracked us up all
evening, btw. :)
Coming down was arduous, though no more so than coming down from a high dose
LSD experience. On LSD, when I try to disco-nap my way to sleep, the
visuals are often pretty banal by the time I‚m coming down, and I can usual
convince myself to sleep despite all the "noise". I couldn‚t do that on
AMT, as the disco-nap visuals were too creepy and strange and tryptamine-y
for me to fall asleep. Mind you, they weren‚t interesting from a "content"
point of view at any point during the experience, but they were definitely
creepy by this point. The length of the coming down period means: plan
ahead! Give yourself *plenty* of time to recover. I also had stomach
cramps all day the next day and other, shall we say, gastrointestinal
unpleasantness; this lasted into the next morning. This drug definitely has
a high body load, probably the most taxing thing, physically, that I‚ve
experienced in a while. I have no experience whatsoever with speed, but
maybe the general exhaustion is due to the amphetamine influence. At any
rate, the drug is likely "worth" dealing with the nausea/stomach problems
(though we speculated that Dramamine might be a neat thing to try at the top
of the trip) and likely "worth" dealing with the strongly annoying and
extremely long coming down period. I‚d certainly take it again, though I‚d
want to wait some time before doing it again. We speculated that higher
doses would probably be in order next time, though I‚d of course be wary
that a higher dose would increase the nausea and lengthen the coming down
period without really boosting the intensity of the peak or lengthening that
portion (similar to what the Xochi poster reports about boosting DOB
dosage); still, it‚s worth researching! (Actually, I‚m sure TIHKAL will
have something to say on this subject) I‚d also look at lower doses too,
just to see if the nausea goes away at any point without losing the fun and
intensity of the peak.
|