|
The New Lycaeum
What's New
Announcements
Disclaimer
Leda
About Leda
Chemicals
Taxonomy
Preparations
Categories
Links
Lycaeum
Homepage
Forums
Chat
Hosted Sites
Books
Contact
About
|
Thorough and well written
Frequently Asked Questions about Coffee
Version 3.11
This FAQ is dedicated to coffee and all that goes with it.
There are several newsgroups in which these topics may be of relevance,
including rec.food.drink.coffee, alt.coffee, alt.food.coffee and
alt.drugs.caffeine.
I welcome any and all contributions to this FAQ. If you do not agree with the
info in here please let me know or write an article for the FAQ. If you feel you
can explain something better than I have, by all means rewrite the article and
send it in.
How to brew the ultimate drink
- What is the best temperature to brew coffee?
- Quality of coffee
- What is the difference between arabica and robusta?
- Just how much ground coffee do I need for x amount of
coffee?
Preparation Methods
- Drip
- Press Pot aka French Press aka Cafetiere aka Bodum
- Espresso
- Vacuum
- Percolator
- Ibrik
Peripherals and Secondary Storage
- Proper care of Coffee makers...
- How to clean espresso machine
- How to store coffee?
- What kind of grinder should I buy?
Miscellaneous
- How do you spell Colombia/Colombian?
- How do you spell Espresso?
- Where did the term "cup of joe" come from?
- What is a Kopi Luak?
- How much caffeine is in decaf?
Coffee Recipes
- Espresso
- Chocolate covered espresso beans
- Cappuccino
- Frappe
- How to make the best cup of coffee
- Turkish Coffee
- Irish Coffee
- Thai Iced Coffee
- Vietnamese Iced Coffee
- Melya
- Caffe Latte
Flavoring
- Chicory
- Italian Syrups
- Other
Espresso Drink Names/Terms
- Caffe Latte aka Cafe au Lait
- Cappuccino
- Americano
- Hammerhead
- Mocha
- Espresso Con Panna
- Double
- Ristretto
- Lungo
Administrivia
- How do I get the newest copy of this FAQ?
- List of Contributors
- Copyright
-
-
According to chemical studies, the optimal water temperature for drip
coffee is 95-98C. According to my notes, colder water doesn't extract
enough caffeine/essential oils from the beans, and above such
temperature the acidity increases wildly.
-
The quality of a brew depends on the following factors (in no
particular order):
- Time since grinding the beans.
- Time since roasting.
- Cleanliness with brewing equipment.
- Bean quality (what crop, etc.).
- Water quality.
Fact: Unless you are buying some major debris, bean quality is not
very important, as compared to 1-3 and 5.
Fact: A coffee can in the supermarket often contains major debris, so
be careful when you choose. (See note below).
Fact: Once you have freshly roasted and ground coffee, filtered water
and equipment free of oil residues from the last brew, quality of beans
makes a huge difference.
NOTE: A coffee can in the supermarket often contains a blend of
Arabica and robusta beans while most coffee houses sell only arabica
beans. Arabica beans are usually flavor rich, while robusta beans have
more caffeine, less flavor and are cheaper to produce.
When you buy coffee, whether in a coffee house or in a supermarket,
you want to get 100% arabica, except for espresso blends, which may be a
combination of both. My personal experience says that a 100% arabica
espresso blend is better but many people (including many Italians) will
disagree on this point, so go with what you like.
For freshness, in a coffee house it is better to buy popular blends
that move fast, while in a supermarket vacuum packaged containers with
expiration date are your best bet.
Chances are you will not get truly fresh coffee in a supermarket. This
is an absolute fact if it is pre-ground. In a coffee house look for a
shop that roasts in-house and ask what was roasted that day. If the
person behind the counter does not know, ask to talk to someone who
cares about coffee. If no one knows, go somewhere else. As a side note,
it should be mentioned that coffee is at its best after 12-24 hours, so
you might be interested in day-old coffee as well if you plan to brew
the same day. Also, grind your own coffee. Buying fresh and then having
it ground defeats the purpose. Ground coffee only lasts a few hours or
one day tops.
-
Arabica beans and robusta beans are two different species of coffee.
They are the primary species of coffee that find their way into the
American cup. The general differences are those of taste, and the
conditions under which the two species differ in production.
Taste: Arabicas have a wider taste range, between varieties.
They range in taste from sweet-soft to sharp-tangy. Their unroasted
smell is sometimes likened to blueberries. Their roasted smell is
perfumey with fruity notes and sugary tones.
Robustas taste range is neutral to harsh and they are often described as
tasting grain-like, oatmeally. Their unroasted smell is often described
as raw-peanutty. Their roasted smell is often likened to burnt rubber.
Production Conditions: Arabicas are delicate, they require cool
tropical climates, lots of moisture, rich soil, shade and sun. They are
subject to attack from various pests, and are extremely vulnerable to
cold and bad handling.
Robustas are hardier plants, capable of growing well at low altitudes,
less subject to problems related to pests and rough handling. They yield
more pounds of finished goods per acre at a lower cost of production.
Economics: Customs and trade, supply and demand over the course
of the last 150 years has determined the relative values of arabica vs.
robusta beans. Generally speaking, the best coffees are all arabicas and
the highest quality blends are pure arabica blends. They are also the
priciest.
In the U.S. you will generally find arabicas in the coffee store and
specialty food shop, and robustas in the supermarket cans and jars of
instant.
In Italy, home of espresso, the very highest quality brands are pure
arabica, and like here, the popular-priced goods are blended with
robusta beans. Because "Imported from Italy" can make an
ordinary supermarket quality Italian espresso a "gourmet"
coffee in the U.S., you will find robustas in some Italian brands
offered for sale in the United States.
The coffee you like is a very personal thing. You may find that you
really prefer the all-arabica blends, or you may feel comfortable with
something less, just because you like it. That's OK. The American
marketplace, thanks to the Specialty Coffee movement here, is now rich
enough in roast types, species, varieties, blends, brews, grinds, and
price points to have something for every taste and pocketbook.
-
a. Whatever seems right to you.
b. It may change slightly from coffee to coffee and according to
freshness.
c. What the Specialty Coffee Association of America (SCAA) has to
say:
A cup is defined as 6 ounces of water before brewing. This will produce
5.33 ounces of brewed coffee. Or 125 ml & 110 ml for Euro style
coffee makers
The SCAA defines 10 grams or .36 oz per cup as the proper measure for
brewed coffee if using the American standards. If using Euro standards
the measure is 7 grams per 125 ml.
To further confuse things I will add a few more measures:
3.75 oz per 1/2 gallon
55 grams per liter
2.25 gallons per 1 lb.
If you want to know more check the SCAA's web page at www.scaa.com.
d. According to "The Coffee Lover's Companion" by Diana
Rosen, the standard is 2 tbs. per 6 oz of water. This to me seems very
high but I have never tried it.
e. My personal taste is 1 "standard measure" per cup of
coffee. A standard measure is approximately 1 tbs. this is a plus or
minus equation depending on the coffee I am using, the degree of roast
(darker = more coffee due to weight loss to keep the same weight per
ounce) and the coffeepot I am brewing in. I believe this should be
approximately in line with the SCAA's advice.
- Drip
Drip is the most common form of coffee served in the United States.
This method essentially pours near-boiling water over medium-course
coffee grounds to produce coffee. This is probably the easiest method of
making coffee. A few words about filters: There are two types of filter
available for drip coffee. One type is paper. The other is a metal or
plastic permanent filter. Neither is innately better but they do produce
different coffee flavors. A paper filter will hold some of the essential
oils that are being released from the coffee. Some people have a
preference for this. In paper filters there are several brands that have
various thickness and types of paper that will absorb more or less of
the oils. One selling point for paper filters is that they are very easy
to clean up; just throw them away. This of course means more landfill
and more trees being cut down. Some people also feel that paper filters
give coffee a papery taste. The permanent filter has some obvious
advantages and disadvantages in relation to paper. I will add just a
couple of ideas about them here. One, use metal; plastic won't
last as long and may give your coffee an off flavor. Two, permanent
filters require a slightly courser grind and you may get some sediment
in your cup. This is probably comparable to the sediment in a coffee
press.
- Press Pot aka French Press aka Cafetiere aka Bodum
A French press is a glass container with a wire mesh attached to a
plunger. To make coffee, you first allow water to come very close to a
boil but just short of this point. If you are heating water in an open
pan, when you see the very beginning of a boil, pull your water. The
overall temperature of the water from top to bottom should even out to
be in the ideal range for coffee. If you are using a closed tea pot,
this is the point where the water just begins to sound different in the
pot. For more information on temperature see
the section on water temperature. The press should be pre-warmed before
putting the coffee in. This will help keep the glass from absorbing as
much heat when the hot water is put in the press thus making for warmer
coffee when you pour. The press should contain approximately the same
amount of very coarsely ground coffee as you would use for drip coffee.
Let it rest for 2-3 minutes or until it is easy to press the plunger
down and then plunge the wire mesh. This filters the coffee. Course
ground coffee is a must here or there will be a great deal of sediment
in the cup. You will have a small amount of sediment no mater what. Due
to the fact that there is no paper filter, all oils make it into the
cup. This is a great cup of coffee.
- Espresso
See the Home
Espresso Machine Mini-FAQ by David Bogie at http://www.islandnet.com/coffee/faq.html
for info on espresso. Also check the info in this file under the recipe
section.
- Vacuum
This is a method I have never experienced so if someone who has
first-hand experience wants to redo this, let me know. The buildup of
steam in the lower bowl forces the water up into the funnel, where it
mixes with the ground coffee. A quick stir wets the grounds into the
water, and a small amount of water left behind in the bowl keeps the
steam coming and the temperature constant. Brewing continues for 2
minutes (it can go longer but you don't get any more flavor) and we then
take the siphon off the hotplate. With no more steam being produced, a
vacuum forms in the bowl, which sucks the brewed coffee down through the
filter.I hear this gives a great cup of coffee and is quite fun to
watch.
Cona (the original) in England, Hario in Japan, and Yama Glass in Taiwan
and Bodum make vacuum pots. Corey & Silex used to make them in the
U.S. and Sunbeam also made a metal model with built-in heating.
- Percolator
Percolators violate most of the natural laws about brewing coffee.
- Don't over extract the oils and flavor. Percolators work by
taking coffee and reheating it and throwing it over the grounds over
and over and over again.
- Never reheat/boil coffee. This destroys the flavor. For
best flavor, boil the water, pass it over the grounds and retain the
heat. Don't reheat it.
Violating these rules may not sound like much, but these are about
the only rules there are. The effect of a percolator is to keep passing
boiling water/coffee over the grounds until there is no flavor left and
the flavor in the coffee is so dead that it's a worthless waste.
- Ibrik
This is being worked on now. Check the next version.
-
It is very important that you wash your coffee maker pot and filter
container thoroughly at least once a week. Bitter oils stick to the
glass container and plastic filter holder.
I used to wash the plastic filter container and rinse the glass pot.
Coffee started to taste bad. When I was told to wash both thoroughly
with plenty of soap the flavor improved instantly. Note: To the naked
eye rinsed and soap washed pots look the same (clean that is).
Another trick is every time you use your coffeepot, unless you are
making another pot right away, put a couple of drops of liquid
dishwashing detergent in the pot and run hot water into the pot. Let
this sit on the counter till you need it again, rinse and you are ready
to go. This does not replace the weekly or twice-weekly washing but
helps keep it cleaner between washings.
Some drip coffee makers require periodic cleansing with a solution of
water and vinegar.
If you have a coffee/teapot, the inside of which is stained with oily
brown residues - also plastic/metal coffee filters, tea strainers, and
stainless steel sinks in caffeine-o-phile houses - they can be restored
to a shining, brand-spanking-new state by washing in hot washing powder
(detergent).
Get a large plastic jug, add 2 or 3 heaped tablespoons of Daz
Automatic or Bold or whatever, and about a pint of hot water -
just off the boil is the best.
Swill the jug around until the detergent is dissolved, and then pour
into tea/coffeepot, and let it stand for 5 minutes, swilling the pot
around occasionally, just to keep the detergent moving. Put the lid on
and shake it a few times (care: slippery + hot)
Repeat as necessary. Keep it hot with a little boiling water if
needed. If you have a cafetiere, disassemble it, and soak the parts in
the mixture for a few minutes, agitating occasionally.
In both cases, the residue just falls off with almost no scrubbing.
It does great things with overused filter machine filters, too.
Important: Rinse off all detergent afterwards, use lots of fresh
water!
-
If the exterior needs cleaning, just use a good cleaner like
Fantastik or the like - note though that Fantastik might actually remove
some of the stamped on text and logos if they are painted on.
If the interior needs cleaning, you need to decalcify it. Add about 3
oz. of vinegar to about 20 oz. of water, and let it run through the
machine. Then run about 3-4 times the amount of fresh water. Several
online coffee sites have info on decalcifying.
If you can disassemble the frothing wand, do so - and get the wand
almost sterile-clean. If little rubber gaskets pop out, DON'T LOSE THEM
and remember what order they go back on.
Same thing goes for the brewhead - that's where the water comes out -
most pump machines have a brewhead that can be removed with a single
screw - tilt your machine on its side (make sure there's no water in it)
and disassemble that part - again, do get it crystal clean - use
toothbrushes, use a clean j-cloth, whatever it takes to get all the
nooks and crannies.
Once the machine is cleaned inside and out, run one more full batch
of water through it, making sure you stop the pump just before all the
water drains out.
-
One should always store coffee beans in a glass, air-tight container.
Air and moisture are coffee's principle enemies. Glass is best because
it doesn't retain the odors of the beans or the oils, which could
contaminate future beans stored in the same container. However, if you
use glass, make sure the container is not exposed to light, as
sunlight is believed to reduce freshness.
Buy only what coffee can be consumed in a week to a week and a half
from the time it was roasted. This is the only way to have truly fresh
coffee.
Do not freeze ground coffee. There are two key problems here. One, the
freezing will damage some of subtle tastes in the coffee and two, when
the coffee is taken out the container will sweat, exposing your coffee
to moisture.
-
First off, any grinder is better than having your coffee preground at
the store. Pregrinding is just a way of insuring stale coffee.
Perhaps the earliest form of grinding anything, whether it be spices
or coffee, was the simple mortar and pestle approach. The item to be
ground - or crushed as it were - was placed in the bottom of a bowl, and
the blunt end of a stick was used to crush said item along the bowl's
bottom and sides. Following this - and history tends to lead us down
numerous paths - mechanical means replaced the mortar and pestle.
Manually operated, the coffee (or, again, spice, wheat, corn...
whatever) was placed between a stationary and a moving disc. The
movement of the one disc atop the other created a grinding force. This
is also known as milling; a term we carry into the present.
Milling has become very efficient with the use of electrical motors
as opposed to horses, water, steam, or human-power. And milling, as a
process, is as common to the agricultural industry as it is to coffee.
To understand the benefit of milling coffee, let us first compare it to
another popular grinding technique, the blade-style coffee grinder.
Available in practically every housewares store in the world, the
blade-style grinder uses a small, universal electrical motor to spin two
metal blades at very high speeds. When in contact with the coffee beans,
the blades chop and crush the bean's structure. Akin to the mortar and
pestle for not creating a uniform grind, this method is quick and
inexpensive. Many models of this type can be had for less than 20$US.
A step up, and the primary focus of this article, is the burr style,
or milling style coffee grinder. Like the wheat or corn grinder, and
essentially identical to commercial, industrial-sized grinders, the burr
grinder for today's consumer is available in a myriad of colors,
features, materials, and prices.
Why a burr grinder?
As mentioned above, the blade variant of coffee grinders allows a
varying particle size from the resultant grind. The leading reason for
the use of a burr grinder is the ability to produce a uniform grind of
the beans. A uniform grind is important for a few different reasons.
First, it provides an even surface area for extraction during whatever
brew process you may wish to use. Second, for espresso, the uniform
grind allows for even wetting and even packing of the grounds.
How come?
Let us return above. An even grind will provide for an even extraction
of the oils from the coffee. Ill-proportioned grind will cause some of
the coffee to over-extract, and some to under-extract. Over-extracted
coffee will taste bitter and overly pungent. Under-extracted will taste
weak and thin.
Burr grinders, ideally and theoretically, pass an incoming bean under
(or in between) its burrs once. Whether it be for one revolution or two,
the bean, as it finishes its pass, is completely crushed into
identically-sized pieces. Blade-style and mortar and pestle re-grind the
coffee, which provides the inconsistency mentioned above.
The Big Debate - Flat-Plate Burr Grinders vs. Conical Burr Grinders:
Burr grinders are distinct by two forms. The first is where the burrs
are plate-shaped and lie atop each other. In the second model, the burrs
are shaped like two mating cones; the grinding teeth facing toward each
burr set. The debate lies with life expectancy (read: wear), grind
consistency, and ease of cleaning. To begin with, both variations are
easy to clean so long as the manufacturer designed the grinder to allow
one of the two burr sets to be removed. To my knowledge, every
manufacturer has done so. It is up to the owner to find the appropriate
cleaning tool used to get into the teeth's grooves. Incidentally, a
stiff bristled brush like that of a toothbrush works well. The debate
flourishes here: does a conical burr-set wear more but provide a greater
grind consistency and slower operating speed (due to prolonged contact
between bean and burr), or does the flat-plate burr-set provide greater
consistency and life because of its ability to operate at faster speeds?
You decide. There are arguments for and against both parties. All in
all, to the average consumer, this argument is like the blowing of the
wind. Meaningless.
"You get what you paid for."
I mentioned this above. And it is true, especially when you figure in
other factors to your potential purchase. These factors are as follows:
Does the machine come with a warranty? If so, how many years?
May I try the machine first before committing to a purchase?
Is the machine too loud?
Is the machine easy to clean up? Does its spill or throw ground coffee
all over the place?
Is there service available in my area? If so, how much extra and how
easy is it to obtain?
Is the machine repairable by myself or a local appliance repairperson?
Keep all of these questions on the tip of your brain when and after you
go shopping. You'll find distinct differences between each and every
model mentioned above. It is true that the higher you go, the greater
the quality of the machine - both in materials used and end product.
Consistency is still very much a driving argument and consistency is
best achieved when higher-quality components and material are used.
These are the biggest questions you need to keep on your mind:
How much will you use this grinder and for what reasons? Do you plan
on only grinding for one style of coffee? Do you plan on using it daily?
Do you plan on using many different types of coffee beans?
If you can answer these questions, you can narrow down your search
very easily.
For more info and the full text of this article check out http://www.seasoned.com/issues/199809/
Another point that deserves attention is that many cheap coffee
grinders have a tendency to have some type of static problems. Some of
the more expensive models can also have these same problems so, as with
other considerations, be sure to try the grinder before you buy.
-
-
Please read the question :).
-
By far, the most common spelling used throughout the world today is
"espresso". This is a shortened form of the original Italian
name for the drink "caffe espresso" (accent marks omitted).
This spelling is considered to be the correct spelling by the vast
majority of of coffee consumers, vendors, retailers, and producers.
Some English language dictionaries also list "expresso" as
a variant spelling. However, this does not mean the spelling is 'equally
valid.' (see the post by Jesse Sheidlower included below)
It was pointed out during the great "espresso vs. expresso"
debate (spring '94) that the Italian alphabet does not even contain the
letter "X," which is incorrect.
Further, it was discovered that at least three dictionaries contained
incorrect definitions of the word "espresso". The American
Heritage Dictionary gave the following definition:
"A strong coffee brewed by forcing steam under pressure
through darkly roasted, powdered coffee beans."
The Oxford English Dictionary said:
"Coffee brewed by forcing steam through powdered coffee
beans"
The Webster New World Dictionary gives:
"coffee prepared in a special machine from finely ground
coffee beans, through which steam under high pressure is forced."
All three of these are wrong. In fact, espresso is a strong coffee
brewed by quickly forcing hot water through darkly roasted, finely-ground
coffee beans.
(Some espresso makers do use steam, but only to force the hot water
through the ground coffee. The steam NEVER touches the coffee. Many
espresso makers use no steam at all. Instead, they use either a pump or
a piston to quickly force hot water through the ground coffee.)
Once these errors and the origins of the word "espresso"
had been pointed out, the argument "but expresso is in the
dictionary" quickly began to crumble. The final death blow to this
position came in a post by dictionary editor Jesse Sheidlower. This post
is reproduced in its entirety below:
Jesse Sheidlower writes
I find this thread fascinating. I regret that it demonstrates an
unfamiliarity with dictionaries and how to use them, but no matter. I
believe that I am the only dictionary editor to participate in this
discussion, so let me waste a bit more bandwidth addressing some of
the points made so far, and introducing a few others:
- The OED, Second Edition, does include _espresso_ and _expresso_,
the latter being a variant of the former. It correctly derives it
from Italian _caffe espresso_. [Accents left off here.] Whoever
claimed it derives the term from a would-be Italian _caffe
expresso_ was in error.
- There _is_ an "x" in Latin and Italian.
Mike Oliver points out that there are two Italian alphabets,
one (il tradizionale) with no w, x or y, and the other one with
all the letters in the English alphabet. The latter seems to be
the one currently in use. (Reference: Il grande dizionario
Garzanti della lingua italiana, Garzanti Editore s.p.a, 1987).
- There are four major American dictionaries (published by Merriam
Webster, Webster's New World, Random House, and American
Heritage). The most recent edition of each gives _espresso_ as the
main form, and _expresso_ as a variant only. The fact that _expresso_
is listed in the dictionary does not mean that it is equally
common: the front matter for each dictionary explains this. The
person who claimed that three dictionaries including OED give _expresso_
as "equally valid" was in error.
- Dictionaries, in general, do not dictate usage: they reflect the
usage that exists in the language. If a dictionary says that
_espresso_ is the main spelling, it means that in the experience
of its editors (based on an examination of the language),
_espresso_ is notably more common. It does not mean that the
editors have a vendetta against _expresso_.
- To the linguist who rejects the authority of dictionaries: I
agree that language is constantly changing; I'm sure that every
dictionary editor in the country does as well. Dictionaries are
outdated before they go to press. But I think they remain accurate
to a large extent. Also, if you are going to disagree with the
conclusions of a dictionary, you should be prepared to back
yourself up. I can defend, with extensive written evidence, our
decision to give _espresso_ as the preferred form.
- The spelling _espresso_ is the form used by the copy desks of
the _New York Times,_ _Gourmet,_ _Bon Appetit,_ The _Wine
Spectator,_ the _Wall St. Journal,_ the _L.A. Times,_ _Time,_
_Newsweek,_ and to my knowledge every other major or minor
newspaper or magazine, general or food-related, in the
English-speaking world. The fact that a handwritten menu on an
Italian restaurant door spells it "expresso" is trivial
by comparison.
- In sum: though both _espresso_ and _expresso_ are found, the
former is by far the more common. It is also to be favored on
immediate etymological evidence, since the Italian word from which
it is directly borrowed is spelled _espresso_. The form _espresso_
is clearly preferred by all mainstream sources.
It has recently come to my attention that the answer to this question
is a bit up in the air so I will be reporting reasonable possibilities
that I pick up from the news groups here. Some or all may be urban
legend but until I have a sure way to know I will use this system.
1. The U.S. Navy used to serve alcoholic beverages on board ships.
However, when Admiral Josephus "Joe" Daniels became Chief of
Naval Operations, he outlawed alcohol onboard ships, except for very
special occasions. Coffee then became the beverage of choice, hence the
term "Cup of Joe."
2. "Joe" is 19th Cent. American slang for coffee.
The only coffee of commerce today that is the product of an animal's
digestive tract is Kopi Luak or Luwak from Sumatra, Java and Sulawesi in
Indonesia. It is reported that the yearly crop is about 80 LB total. It
retails in the US for about $18.50 oz. or $296.00 LB. and is available
from John Martinez & Son in Atlanta, GA.
According to the former head of the Indonesian national zoo, as told to
the Smithsonian's rep. Kopi Luak is a fiction with a great sales pitch.
(See: http://www.si.edu/natzoo/coffee.htm
)
Does it really exist? That is a good question. Is something being sold
in the US as Kopi Luak? Yes.
Check out what Dave
Barry had to say about it at: http://home.earthlink.net/~munson/tom/coffee/nov9.html.
In the United States federal regulations require that in order to
label coffee as "decaffeinated" that coffee must have had its
caffeine level reduced by no less than 97.5 percent.
Example: Panamanian coffee is about 1.36% caffeine by weight
normally. This and many other arabica coffees are about 98.64% caffeine
free even before anything is done to lower the caffeine content..
When 97% of the caffeine has been removed only .0408 % of the coffee
weight is caffeine. About 4/10ths of 1%. At this level it is labeled
"decaffeinated. How roasters label their products is another
matter. Suppose two roasters roast Panama coffee that originally came
from the same lot, and were decaffeinated together in the same vat. One
roaster labels his decaf. "97% Caffeine Removed." The other
says his is "99+% Caffeine Free." Which roaster is not telling
the truth?
The answer is: They are both right. They are both essentially saying
the same thing. But, which decaf. does the average consumer believe has
the least caffeine?
Currently used solvents for decaffeinating coffee include, H2O
(water), CO2 (Carbon Dioxide), Meth. Chloride, Ethyl Acetate. Note: A
relatively new method called Swiss Water Decaffeinated uses
"flavor-charged" water in the decaffeination process.
NOTE: I do not entirely agree with some of the assertions made in a
couple of these recipes and do not know much about some of the preparation
methods described, so use these at your own risk.
-
I need a good write up of how to make espresso. Someone please help
out here.
You won't get single, glossy beans, but the taste is there!
- Put dark roast coffee beans on a waxpaper-covered baking sheet.
- Melt some chocolate by putting a container with the chocolate in a pan
of boiling water, stir the chocolate when it is getting hot. Some
experimentation regarding what chocolate to use is in place. I used
chocolate chips from Ghiradelli. One should probably aim for dark and
not too sweet chocolate.
- Pour the chocolate over the beans and smear it so that each bean is
covered - you should have a single layer of covered beans not too far
apart.
- When the beans have cooled off a little bit, put the sheet in the
fridge/freezer.
- When solid, break off a piece and enjoy. Note: I often use very finely
ground (think espresso grind) coffee for this.
Disclaimer: People prepare cappuccino in many different ways, and in
their very own way, each one of them is correct. The following recipe, which
is commonly used in Latin countries, has been tasted by several of my North
American friends and they unanimously agreed that cappuccino prepared using
this recipe tastes much better than the standard fare in USA/Canada.
Start with cold milk (it doesn't really need to be ice-cold), use homo.
milk or carnation. 2% or skim is just not thick enough (though admittedly,
it is easier to produce foam with skim milk).
Place the milk in a special cappuccino glass with a cappuccino basket.
(Cappuccino glasses have a thinner bottom).
Aerate the milk near the top, within 2cm (1 in.) of the top. Move the
glass down as the milk aerates. It is a good idea to have an oscillating
motion while aerating the milk. (ed. The process of oscillation probably
won't really add much to your drink but it does look cool.)
Aerating the milk in another container, then pouring in a glass and
adding the foam with a spoon is sacrilege.
If you need to aerate the milk in a separate container, aerate exactly
the amount of milk required for one cup, so no need to add foam with a
spoon.
Once the milk has been aerated, promptly clean the aerator with a wet
rag. Failure to do so will quickly result in rotten milk flavor coming from
the aerator.
Another warning on similar lines applies to restaurant-type coffee
machines: leave the aerator valve open when powering the machine up and
down. When the machine is off a partial vacuum is formed in the boiler that
will suck milk residue into the boiler. This then coats the inside of the
boiler and can cause bad smelling steam until the boiler is flushed. Some
machines have a vacuum bleed valve to prevent this problem but many don't.
Wait for the steam pressure to build up again (for some cappuccino makers
wait time is near zero, for others it may be as long as 60 secs.).
Prepare the espresso coffee - you may add it directly to the glass if
possible or use a cup and then pour it from the cup on the milk.
According to Jym Dyer: In Italy, the milk is added TO the espresso, not
the other way around, that way the milk is floating; on top, where you then
add the sugar, and stir it up.
Cappuccino tastes better when it is really hot, and has two teaspoons of
sugar. (small teaspoons, like the ones in expensive silverware).
Then, accompany said cappuccino with a warm tea bisquit or English muffin
with marmalade, or alternatively with a baguette sandwich or panini.
Frappe coffee is widely consumed in parts of Europe and Latin America,
especially in summer. Originally, it was made with cold espresso. Nowadays
it is prepared in most places by shaking into a shaker 1-2 teaspoons of
instant coffee with sugar, water and ice-cubes and it is served in a long
glass with ice, milk to taste and a straw. The important thing is the thick
froth on top of the glass.
The best coffee I ever tasted was while in the coffee growing regions of
Mexico, in the state of Veracruz, in the town of Coatepec. The quality of
the coffee was mostly due to the method of preparation rather than the
quality of the grains (which is at about the same level as an average
Colombian coffee). Here's how to make it:
- Grind the coffee grains from coarse to very coarse.
- Boil in a pan a liter of water (four cups).
- When the water is boiling, turn off the stove and add 8-12 tablespoons
of coffee (2-3 spoons for each cup).
- Add 2-3 teaspoons of sugar per cup (for a total of 8-12 spoons of
sugar).
- Stir very slowly (the water is so hot that the sugar dissolves
mostly on its own).
- Let the coffee rest for about 5 minutes.
- Strain the coffee using a metal strainer! Like the ones used
for cooking. The strainer should be like the ones used by granny for
making tea. The diameter is a bit smaller than a cup, with a semi-sphere
shape.
- This coffee has grit in the bottom, even after being strained.
Therefore do not stir the pot or the cup. If the coffee is
shaken, let it rest for about five minutes. Needless to say, do not
drink the last sip of coffee from the cup: it's all grit. If you want to
add milk, add Carnation.
Warning: This coffee may fool you 'cause it has a very smooth
taste but is extremely strong. Caffeine content per milliliter is right
there with espresso, but you can't tell!
Note: For some strange reason, when preparing this coffee I tend to have
a success ratio of about one out of two attempts. I still don't know what
I'm doing wrong, since, as far as I can tell, I always repeat the same
steps. Perhaps sometimes I don't let the coffee rest long enough.
This type of coffee is similar in nature to the French press. And in
principle, you could possibly add sugar to the ground coffee, then pour
water, and lastly press with the strainer.
Turkish coffee is prepared using a little copper pot called a raqwa.
Use a heaping teaspoon of very finely-ground coffee and, optionally, one
heaping teaspoon of sugar (to taste). Use about 3oz of coffee. [Add the
sugar only just before boiling point.] Turkish coffee without sugar is
called sade, with a little sugar is "orta s,ekerli" and with lots
of sugar is "c,ok s,ekerli".
The trick of it is to heat it until it froths, pour the froth into the
coffee cup and heat it a second time. When it froths again, pour the rest
into the cup.
The grounds will settle to the bottom of the cup as you drink the coffee
and towards the end, it'll start to taste bitter and the texture will be
more like wet coffee grounds than a drink. As soon as this happens stop or
your next sip will taste really, really bitter. Instead, turn your cup
upside down on the saucer, and let someone read your fortune!
Ingredients
- Sturdy wine glass or glass with stem
- 1 teaspoon sugar
- 1 or 2 tablespoons Irish whiskey
- black coffee
- cream, lightly whipped
Instructions
- Place spoon in glass. Heat glass by pouring in warm water. When glass
is warm, pour out the water. Leave spoon in glass.
- Put sugar, whiskey and coffee in glass. Stir to dissolve sugar. Still
leave spoon in glass.
- Now for the tricky bit: Put dollop of cream on top, allow the cream to
slide down the back of spoon (the spoon which was in the coffee), the
tip of the spoon should remain in the coffee.
Be careful not to stir after the cream has been added. The cream should
form a foamy layer about 1 cm (or half an inch) thick on top of the black
coffee.
Make very strong coffee (50-100% more coffee to water than usual),
use something like Cafe Du Monde which has chicory in it. Pour 6-8 oz into
cup and add about 1 Tbs. sweetened condensed milk. Stir, then pour over ice.
You'll have to experiment with the strength and milk so you get lots of
taste after the ice/water dilutes it.
Alternatively, this version which comes from a newspaper article of many
years ago simply calls for grinding two or three fresh cardamom pods and
putting them in with the coffee grounds. Make a strong coffee with a fresh
dark roast, chill it, sweeten and add half-and-half to taste.
Lastly, we have the following recipe:
Makes 1 8-cup pot of coffee
- 6 tablespoons whole rich coffee beans, ground fine
- 1/4 teaspoon ground coriander powder
- 4 or 5 whole green cardamom pods, ground
Place the coffee and spices in the filter cone of your coffee maker. Brew
coffee as usual; let it cool.
In a tall glass, dissolve 1 or 2 teaspoons of sugar in an ounce of the
coffee (it's easier to dissolve than if you put it right over ice). Add 5-6
ice cubes and pour coffee to within about 1" of the top of the glass.
Rest a spoon on top of the coffee and slowly pour whipping cream into the
spoon. This will make the cream float on top of the coffee rather than
dispersing into it right away.
To be totally cool, serve with Flexi-Straws and paper umbrellas...
One other fun note: I got a fresh vanilla bean recently and put it to good
use by sealing it in an airtight container with my sugar. The sugar gets the
faintest vanilla aroma and is incredible in Real Chocolate Milk (TM) and iced
coffee.
One final note: this would probably be even better with iced espresso,
because the espresso is so much more powerful and loses its taste less when it's
cold.
Another recipe:
- Strong, black ground coffee
- Sugar
- Evaporated (not condensed) milk
- Cardamom pods
Prepare a pot of coffee at a good European strength (Miriam Nadel suggests 2
tablespoons per cup, which I'd say is about right). In the ground coffee, add 2
or 3 freshly ground cardamom pods. (I've used green ones, I imagine the brown
ones would give a slightly different flavor.) Sweeten while hot, then cool
quickly.
Serve over ice, with unsweetened evaporated milk (or heavy cream if you're
feeling extra indulgent). To get the layered effect, place a spoon atop the
coffee and pour the milk carefully into the spoon so that it floats on the top
of the coffee.
The recipe I have calls for:
- 1/4 cup strong French roasted coffee
- 1/2 cup boiling water
- 2 tsp. sweetened condensed milk
- Mix the above and pour over ice.
I'd probably use less water and more coffee and milk.
There is also a stronger version of Thai coffee called "Oliang or Oleng"
which is very strong to me and to a lot of coffee lovers.
6 to 8 tablespoons ground espresso or French roast coffee, 4 to 6 green
cardamom pods, crushed sugar to taste, half-and-half or cream and ice cubes
Put the cardamom pods and the ground dark-roast coffee into a coffee press,
espresso maker, or the filter of a drip coffee maker (if using a drip-style
coffee maker, use half the water). Brew coffee as for espresso, stir in sugar.
Fill a large glass with ice and pour coffee over ice, leaving about 1/2 inch
at the top. Place a spoon at the surface of the coffee and slowly pour
half-and-half or cream into the spoon, so that it spreads across the top of the
coffee rather than sinking in. (You'll stir it in yourself anyway, but this is a
much prettier presentation and it's as used in most Thai restaurants.)
As with Vietnamese coffee, the struggle here is to keep from downing this all
in ten seconds.
And now for another look at Thai Iced Coffee
Surely, one can get coffee with condensed milk in Thailand. But when one
speaks of "Thai Iced Coffee", as found in Thai restaurants in America,
one is referring to "Oliang/Oleng" [there is no standard
transliteration of the Thai alphabet, so the spelling varies.] In the FAQ one
reads: "There is also a stronger version of Thai coffee called "Oleng"
which is very strong to me and to a lot of coffee lovers." But this IS Thai
Iced Coffee. And it is only strong if you brew it to be strong.
Oliang is a blend of coffee and other ingredients. The brand I have (Pantainorasingh
Brand) states the percentages right on the label: 50% coffee, 25% corn, 20% soya
bean, 5% sesame seed. This blend of coffee and roasted grains is really quite
exquisite--a perfect marriage of flavors!
Traditionally, oliang is brewed with a "tung tom kah fe"--a metal
ring with a handle to which is attached a muslin-like cloth bag. It is much like
those cloth tea-strainers one finds in Europe, only larger, like a sock. One
puts the coffee in the bag and pours over it water that has come to a boil -
into a carafe. Let the bag full of coffee steep in the carafe for 10 minutes.
Then add sugar and stir. Let it cool. Pour into a glass with ice, and add the
dairy product of your choice on top. I use fresh half-and- half, but you can use
condensed milk, evaporated milk, or a mix of the two, or of the three. The
proportions of coffee - water - sugar, vary. I use 2/3 part oliang to 1 1/4
parts sugar to 6 parts water.
[The tung tom kah fe can be found at SE Asian grocery stores--after a bit of
searching. In Seattle at Viet Wah or Mekong Ranier.]
Alternately, one can bring water to a boil in a pot, add the coffee, and
remove from heat. Let the coffee steep for 10 minutes. Then strain through
cheesecloth, a coffee filter, or a fine metal strainer. And continue as above.
Same coffee as above. Sweetened condensed (not evaporated) milk, ice
Make even stronger coffee, preferably in a Vietnamese coffee maker. (This is
a metal cylinder with tiny holes in the bottom and a perforated disc that fits
into it; you put coffee in the bottom of the cylinder, place the disc atop it,
then fill with boiling water and a very rich infusion of coffee drips slowly
from the bottom.)
If you are using a Vietnamese coffee maker, put two tablespoons of sweetened
condensed milk in the bottom of a cup and put the coffee maker on top of the
cup. If you are making espresso or cafe filter (the infusion method where you
press the plunger down through the grounds after several minutes of infusion),
mix the sweetened condensed milk and the coffee any way you like.
When the milk is dissolved in the coffee (yes, dissolved *is* the right word
here!), pour the combination over ice and sip.
Thai and Vietnamese coffees are very different.
Ca phe sua da (Vietnamese style iced coffee)
- 2 to 4 tablespoons finely ground dark roast coffee (preferably with
chicory)
- 2 to 4 tablespoons sweetened condensed milk (e.g., Borden Eagle Brand, not
evaporated milk!)
- Boiling water
- Vietnamese coffee press [see notes]
- Ice cubes
Place ground coffee in Vietnamese coffee press and screw lid down on the
grounds. Put the sweetened condensed milk in the bottom of a coffee cup and set
the coffee maker on the rim. Pour boiling water over the screw lid of the press;
adjust the tension on the screw lid just till bubbles appear through the water,
and the coffee drips slowly out the bottom of the press.
When all water has dripped through, stir the milk and coffee together. You
can drink it like this, just warm, as ca phe sua neng, but I prefer it over ice,
as ca phe sua da. To serve it that way, pour the milk-coffee mixture over ice,
stir, and drink as slowly as you can manage. I always gulp mine too fast. :-)
Notes:
A Vietnamese coffee press looks like a stainless steel top hat. There's a
"brim" that rests on the coffee cup; in the middle of that is a
cylinder with tiny perforations in the bottom. Above that rises a threaded rod,
to which you screw the top of the press, which is a disc with similar tiny
perforations. Water trickles through these, extracts flavor from the coffee, and
then trickles through the bottom perforations. It is excruciatingly slow.
Loosening the top disc speeds the process, but also weakens the resulting coffee
and adds sediment to the brew.
If you can't find a Vietnamese coffee press, regular-strength espresso is an
adequate substitute, particularly if made with French-roast beans or with a dark
coffee with chicory. I've seen the commonly available Medaglia d'Oro brand
coffee cans in Vietnamese restaurants, and it works, though you'll lose some of
the subtle bitterness that the chicory offers. Luzianne brand coffee comes with
chicory and is usable in Vietnamese coffee, though at home I generally get
French roast from my normal coffee provider. My father tells me that when he
visits Vietnamese friends in Florida that Luzianne and a local blend are the
coffees sold in the local Vietnamese-run/shopped stores.
Of these two coffees, Vietnamese coffee should taste more or less like melted
Haagen-Dazs coffee ice cream, while Thai iced coffee has a more fragrant and
lighter flavor from the cardamom and half-and-half rather than the condensed
milk. Both are exquisite, and not difficult to make once you've got the
equipment.
As a final tip, I often use my old-fashioned on-the-stove espresso maker (the
one shaped like an hourglass, where you put water in the bottom, coffee in the
middle, and as it boils the coffee comes out in the top) for Thai iced coffee.
The simplest way is merely to put the cardamom and sugar right in with the
coffee, so that what comes out the top is ready to pour over ice and add
half-and-half. It makes a delicious and very passable version of
restaurant-style Thai iced coffee.
- Espresso
- Honey
- Unsweetened cocoa
Brew espresso; for this purpose, a Bialetti-style stovetop will work. In a
coffee mug, place 1 teaspoon of unsweetened powdered cocoa; then cover a
teaspoon with honey and drizzle it into the cup. Stir while the coffee brews;
this is the fun part. The cocoa seems to coat the honey without mixing, so you
get a dusty, sticky mass that looks as though it will never mix. Then all at
once, presto! It looks like dark chocolate sauce. Pour hot espresso over the
honey, stirring to dissolve. Serve with cream (optional). I have never served
this cold but I imagine it would be interesting; I use it as a great hot drink
for cold days, though, so all my memories are of gray skies, heavy sweaters,
damp feet and big smiles.
A Latte is usually a 3:1 ratio of steamed milk and espresso, but YMMV. Do
what you like best.
Here's how I make a latte. First, I grind my beans to fill my shot filter.
Those are the removable components in your portafilter (that arm thing). If you
don't have a grinder, buy one, and buy a burr grinder - not one of those cheapo
blade things.
So I grind my beans, fill my filter, and tamp it down tightly - that's the
act of compressing the grind in the filter. Note: you can't really do this with
the steam espresso filters because they are not designed for any real pressure
(less than one bar I believe). If you do tamp a steam toy, the pressure release
valve should kick in to save the day but if it does not work you are taking a
chance with a very hot exploding machine. Don't tamp steam machines.
I load the espresso machine with the grinds, then turn on the machine, but to
the steaming ready stage - not the espresso stage. Once it is ready, I steam my
milk first.
Lattes are steamed milk, not frothed. Though again, it's your choice - if you
want froth, go for it. Steam your milk to about 150F or so (you will notice a
change in the steaming sound - it starts to rumble once it hits 150 or so). If
you want froth, about midway, pull the steam nozzle to hover right at the
surface - you want to hear a deep frothing sound - if the sound you hear is like
blowing bubbles through a straw, you're too high.
Once the milk is steamed, I then take a small 4 oz. cup I have and place it
under the portafilter. I switch over to making my espresso, and I brew the
espresso.
I then pour the espresso into the cup with the milk. Most of my
"coffee" cups are actually glass or stainless steel, or a combo of
both, so I pour my espresso slowly and it creates a cool looking drink... the
espresso sits near the top, just below the foam.
Add sugar, sprinkle the top with cinnamon and/or chocolate, and drink!
Oh, don't forget to clean your wand before you brew the espresso. It's quick
- just grab a washcloth and scrub it clean, then run the wand once more to
"flush it out" - this keeps milk from turning into harmful bacteria
that makes your milk taste bad.
Once you've had your latte, dislodge the portafilter, dump your beans, give
the brewhead a quick wipe, a good rinse on your filters, etc., and you're ready
for your next one - less cleaning!
Note: Many people brew espresso then steam their milk. Many do it the way
described here. The arguments go like this:
If you brew then steam the milk while you are waiting for the machine to reach
steaming temperature, the espresso is getting old. On the other hand, if you
steam then brew, you either have to let the machine cool a bit before making
your shot, thus allowing the milk to cool, or you will be hitting the coffee
grounds with steam and not hot water. Which is correct? I can not tell you. I
rarely drink anything at home except straight shots so I don't worry myself with
it too much. On a side note: if you really want the best I believe some home
machines may have dual water reservoirs which will allow you to brew and steam
simultaneously, or at least nearly simultaneously.
NOTE: Flavorings really should not be needed in good coffee but we all want
something a little different every now and again. As a general rule, adding your
own flavoring is a better approach to drinking flavored coffee than buying
pre-flavored coffee. Commercially-flavored coffee usually uses a low quality
bean since most of the flavor will be masked by the chemical flavorings anyway.
So be warned - in many cases you are paying a lot for cheap beans that have had
a chemical added to them to make them more palatable. It is my opinion that if
you start with a good quality coffee, there is very little need for external
flavoring except as an occasional change of pace. As in all things coffee, go
with your taste. If you like flavored coffee by all means drink it!
One last note. If you buy flavored coffee wash all your coffee equipment
thoroughly after brewing flavored coffee. The flavoring agents used will stick
to anything used with them. Do not use the same grinder to grind flavored and
unflavored coffee. It will take approximately 20 grinding of coffee to remove
all the flavoring agents that stick to the internal part of the grinder.
-
Chicory became popular in the United States as a coffee additive during
the Union blockade of the South during the Civil War. It was also used again
During World War II to "stretch" coffee (just ask your
grandmother). It has lost popularity in the US as a coffee additive in
recent years. Chicory is also used in Vietnamese coffee blends as well.
As a flavoring, chicory has a tendency to mellow bitter coffee. Today
chicory blend coffee is available canned with various ratios of coffee to
chicory. There are several brands available today. I counted three when I
went to the grocery store last. Chicory is also available by itself in many
grocery stores, and I am told some health food stores carry chicory root as
well. I recommend going with the method of buying your chicory and mixing it
with fresh roasted coffee; by default any coffee you buy pre-ground and
premixed will be stale when you get it. Concentration varies from 10-30% in
most commercial blends.
-
Italian syrups are popular as flavorings for espresso drinks and to a
lesser extent other forms of coffee. Essentially what they are is sugar
water with a flavoring added. In this they serve a dual purpose of flavoring
the drink while sweetening. They also have a side role in weakening the
drink they are added to. Over all I do not like Italian syrups for this last
reason.
Use your own judgement - they are very popular, so obviously many people do
like them.
-
Chocolate syrup makes a great mocha. Much better than Italian syrups.
Hot chocolate mix makes for a nice mocha and has sugar already added. I
sometimes will give friends who do not like coffee a cup with a packet of
instant hot chocolate mixed in to let them acquire a taste for coffee.
Altoids make a nice peppermint coffee.
Cinnamon is easy: just put it in the bottom of a filter for drip coffee.
You can do the same for press coffee but you will have some extra sediment.
For nut coffee: grind roasted nut of the variety you want and put it in
with the coffee as it brews. Generally speaking this will not be as strong
as chemical flavorings.
Any extract you can buy can be used as a flavoring although I feel many
extracts will give coffee a chemical flavor so you may get bad coffee with
this method.
-
-
A Caffe Latte is a single shot of espresso with steamed milk. There
is not frothed milk in this drink. A Caffe Latte should have
approximately 6 to 8 ounces of milk in it. (Note: ordering a Latte in an
Italian restaurant may get you a glass of milk so be sure to order Caffe
latte.)
-
Cappuccino is traditionally equal parts espresso, steamed milk and
frothed milk. Many coffee shops will add much more milk than this in the
belief that bigger is better. This is not the case stick with the above
proportions for good cappuccino.
-
An Americano is a single shot of espresso with 6 to 8 ounces of hot
water added. Not as bad as it sounds.
-
A hammerhead is a shot of espresso in a coffee cup that is then
filled with drip coffee. I highly recommend this drink.
-
This is usually a cappuccino or a Caffe Latte with chocolate syrup
added. This term actually has very little meaning so you might want to
ask what it is in a given coffee house before you order one.
-
This is a shot with whipped cream.
-
Two shots of espresso with the same amount of all other ingredients.
< LI>
-
This is a restricted shot. Less water is allowed to come through the
coffee. This is approximately a .75 ounce pull.
-
This is an extra long pull allowing approximately twice as much water
through the same amount of coffee as normally used for a single shot.
This will be bitter and I do not recommend trying it. It's about a 2-3
ounce shot.
-
-
How do I get the newest copy of this FAQ?
How do I get the newest copy of this FAQ?
My page at http://aomt.netmegs.com/coffee/coffaq.html
or via e-mail send a message to coffeefaq@aomt.netmegs.com
or for the caffeine faq:
My page at http://aomt.netmegs.com/coffee/caffaq.html
or via e-mail send a message to caffeinefaq@aomt.netmegs.com
-
This FAQ is a collective effort. Here's a list of most (all?) of the
contributors.
- Oktay Ahiska (oktay@NOSPAM.rga.com)
- Marc Aurel (4-tea-2@NOSPAM.bong.saar.de)
- Scott Austin (scotta@NOSPAM.cnt.com)
- Tom Benjamin (tomb@NOSPAM.panix.com)
- Jennifer Beyer (jennifer@NOSPAM.joltcola.com)
- Steve Bliss (steveb@NOSPAM.pcdocs.com)
- David Alan Bozak (dab@NOSPAM.moxie)
- Rajiv (w94_bhatnaga@NOSPAM.wums.wustl.edu)
- Trevor P. Bugera (tbugera@NOSPAM.spots.ab.ca)
- Jack Carter (scjack@NOSPAM.ausvm1.ibm.com)
- Richard Drapeau (Richard.Drapeau@NOSPAM.p1.f92.n282.z1.tdkt.kksys.com)
- Jym Dyer (jym@NOSPAM.remarque.berkeley.edu)
- Steve Dyer (dyer@NOSPAM.spdcc.com)
- Stefan Engstrom (stefan@NOSPAM.helios.UCSC.EDU)
- Lemieux Francois (lemieuxf@NOSPAM.ERE.UMontreal.CA)
- Scott Fisher (sfisher@NOSPAM.megatest.com)
- Dave Huddle (jhuddle@NOSPAM.cas.org)
- Matt Humphrey (matth@NOSPAM.rocketcola.com)
- Tom F Karlsson (tomk@NOSPAM.mamba.csd.uu.se)
- Bob Kummerfeld (bob@NOSPAM.basser.cs.su.OZ.AU)
- Dr. Robert Lancashire (rjlanc@NOSPAM.uwimona.edu.JM)
- John Levine (johnl@NOSPAM.iecc.com)
- Alex Lopez-Ortiz (alopez-o@NOSPAM.unb.ca)
- Alec Muffett (alecm@NOSPAM.uk.sun.com)
- Dana Myers (myers@NOSPAM.cypress.West.Sun.COM)
- Tim Nemec (tim@NOSPAM.netins.net)
- Mike Oliver (oliver@NOSPAM.math.ucla.edu)
- Jim Pailin (pailinje@NOSPAM.ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu)
- Dave Palmer (arxt@NOSPAM.quads.uchicago.edu)
- Stuart Phillips (phillips@NOSPAM.healthy.uwaterloo.ca)
- Siobhan Purcell (PURCELLS@NOSPAM.IRLEARN.UCD.IE)
- Cary A. Sandvig (sandvig@NOSPAM.rhea.cray.com)
- Jesse T Sheidlower (jester@NOSPAM.panix.com)
- Stepahine da Silva (arielle@NOSPAM.taronga.com)
- Michael A Smith (mas@NOSPAM.cyberspy.REMOVE_THIS.com)
- Mari J. Stoddard (stoddard@NOSPAM.gas.uug.arizona.edu)
- Thom (thomd@NOSPAM.atm.com)
- Deanna K. Tobin T.E. (yakityak@NOSPAM.dolphin.upenn.edu)
- Nick Tsoukas (japetus@NOSPAM.orfeas.chemeng.ntua.gr)
- Adam Turoff (ziggy@NOSPAM.panix.com)
- Ganesh Uttam (g.uttam@NOSPAM.ic.ac.uk)
- David R. B. Walker (drbw@NOSPAM.mail.che.utexas.edu)
- Orion Wilson (moria@NOSPAM.cats.ucsc.edu)
- Piotr Wlaz (wlaz@NOSPAM.ursus.ar.lublin.pl)
- Ted Young (theodric@NOSPAM.MIT.EDU)
- Steven Zikopoulos (szikopou@NOSPAM.superior.carleton.ca)
- Donald N. Schoenholt (I840COFFEE@NOSPAM.aol.com)
- Mark (spiffey@NOSPAM.mail.rchmd1.bc.wave.home.com)
- Chris Schaefer (cschaefer@NOSPAM.westbend.com)
- Daniel Owen (daniel.owen@NOSPAM.pobox.com)
- David Turnbull (dpt@NOSPAMnewsguy.com)
- Stephen Schreck (sshreck@NOSPAMdirectcon.net)
- Peter (peterdy@NOSPAMaol.com)
- Scott (Heimdall@NOSPAMnassau.cv.net)
- Ross Jaburg (jaburg@NOSPAMmobilebay.net)
- Alan Frew (alanfrew@coffeeco.com.au)
-
This FAQ is Copyright (C) 1994,1995 by Alex Lopez-Ortiz.
This FAQ is Copyright © 1998 by Daniel Owen. This text, in whole or
in part, may not be sold in any medium, including, but not limited to,
electronic, CD-ROM, or published in print, without the explicit, written
permission of Daniel Owen caffeine@aomt.netmegs.com.
Copyright (C) 1994, Alex López-Ortiz.
Copyright © 1998 Daniel Owen. caffeine@aomt.netmegs.com.
This document Copyright © 1998 Daniel Owen. Created 9/5/2001 14:04:35 Modified 9/5/2001 14:04:35 | Leda version 1.4.3 |
|