The Lycaeum Forums  

Username
Password

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Ritalin Linked to 500 Percent Increased Risk of Sudden Death in Children  (Read 662 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
ST1R
UberHater
Ultimate Contributor

Offline Offline

Posts: 8268


"You love to hate him"


« on: June 17, 2009, 03:19:07 PM »

Ritalin ADHD Drug Linked to 500 Percent Increased Risk of Sudden Death in Children

Tuesday, June 16, 2009 by: Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor


Just how dangerous are the amphetamine stimulant drugs prescribed for children with so-called ADHD? According to scientific research funded by the FDA and the National Institute of Mental Health, drugs such as Ritalin increase the risk of sudden death by five hundred percent among children and teens.

In these cases of sudden death, the child suddenly collapses and dies, only to be discovered later by parents or siblings. That's what happened to Matthew Hohmann in 2004 [link to abcnews.go.com] , and according to this new research, it keeps happening to more and more children at a rate that's 500 percent higher than would be considered typical for children of a similar age and health status.

ADHD drugs like Ritalin are, of course, amphetamine stimulants. They used to be sold on the street as "speed," but now they're prescribed by psychiatrists to children after a subjective diagnosis of a fictitious disease: ADHD -- a "disorder" which has no measurable biological symptoms whatsoever.

Interestingly, the FDA banned ephedra, an herbal stimulant, after a handful of consumers died from consuming huge amounts of the herb in a desperate effort to lose weight. In that case, in banning the herb, the FDA announced "the risks outweigh the benefits," declaring that "ephedra is not safe at any dose."

In great contrast to that, even as children are literally dropping dead after taking ADHD drugs, the FDA is now insisting "the benefits are worth the risks."

But what benefits, exactly, are they talking about? There are no trusted scientific studies whatsoever showing ADHD drugs like Ritalin have any long-term positive effect on children. In fact, the available studies show that ADHD drugs stunt the physical growth of children while impairing brain development. Children who take these drugs, in other words, are not merely at a 500 percent increased risk of sudden death; they are almost assured to be stunted in their brain and body growth by this dangerous amphetamine stimulant drug.

The only real benefits to ADHD drugs, it turns out, are the financial benefits to the drug companies. With hundreds of millions of doses of ADHD drugs sold around the world each year, Big Pharma is raking in the profits while children are dropping dead in their own homes. So when the FDA says "the benefits are worth the risks," what they mean is that the financial benefits to the drug companies are worth the risks to the lives of children.

Pharmaceuticals pose an imminent danger to our children

When parents take their children to psychiatrists and are told to put them on drugs like Ritalin, most parents believe what the doctors say. They believe the FDA wouldn't approve a drug so dangerous that it could kill their child without warning. And they believe the drug companies would never sell products that harm people.

But those beliefs are foolish. In reality, the FDA, the drug companies and the psychiatrists are all working in collusion, knowingly pushing dangerous, deadly drugs onto families for the sole purpose of generating profits. While children suffer and die, they cash in on the ADHD delusion, first by promoting a fictitious disease and then later through high-profit pharmaceutical quackery.

And yet, astonishingly, the mainstream media says nothing. Senators and Congresspeople remain silent. Corrupt, dishonest psych doctors keep pushing the pills and pharmacists keep filling the bottles while children die, day after day, from the very drugs they were told would help them.

The mass drugging of our own children is the greatest unacknowledged crime of our time. It is a modern-day chemical holocaust being perpetrated by our own health care system!

Today, the pharmaceutical industry operates as an organized drug ring, inventing fictitious diseases, then cashing in on the "treatments" for those diseases even though the treatments ultimately harm far more people than they conceivably help. To further boost their profits, the drug companies offer free "screening" -- based on an utterly unscientific tests rigged to label virtually everyone with ADHD (adults included).

The entire ADHD scene is a circus of junk science, corporate profiteering and FDA betrayal. If it wasn't so tragic and deadly, it would be downright laughable. Yet, sadly, the mass chemical poisoning of our children continues today, and those who profit from it continue to call it "treatment."
Logged

Temporarily on Break. Will Return Near June!
Papa Doobie
Super Contributor

Offline Offline

Posts: 440


Scooby Doobie Doo!


« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2009, 05:36:31 PM »

doesn't exactly read like an unbiased study, but certainly makes a lot of valid, logical points. i myself have considered trying to get diagnosed with ADD, just to see if I could do it, seems to me these days they're doling out the pills to any parent that asks for them.
Logged

Some things you can't explain
Like why we're all embracing conventional wisdom
In a world that's just so unconventional
-Built To Spill
ST1R
UberHater
Ultimate Contributor

Offline Offline

Posts: 8268


"You love to hate him"


« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2009, 12:29:36 AM »

The trick is to say you are fine but "other people say that I'm...", then tentatively refuse medication. I watched, on the edge of tears, while a doctor literally tried to force a script for dilaudid into my straight-edge sisters' hand. Why, you ask, why was I near crying? Because a few weeks earlier was rx'd ibuprofen for a broken bone. My sister was there for "extreme" PMS!  cheesy cry undecided cheesy cheesy

I was in moderate pain, watching two people try to force a holy grail upon each other. If either of them threw it away I figured I had at least a 50% chance of snagging then filling it. It was just a few pills but I was drooling at the chance, pissed at the inequity and aching with pain. I was frustrated like a 12 year old at spring break. All desire, no chance.

Shit! I think I just kasumi'd that thread cheesy Let that be a lesson kiddies, if ya drink a bottle of 12 year scotch don't forget the water back. wink
Logged

Temporarily on Break. Will Return Near June!
DrYRHead
Uberator
Ultimate Contributor

Offline Offline

Posts: 9081


Sally as the cave


WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2009, 04:05:09 PM »

doesn't exactly read like an unbiased study, but certainly makes a lot of valid, logical points. i myself have considered trying to get diagnosed with ADD, just to see if I could do it, seems to me these days they're doling out the pills to any parent that asks for them.

Yes, I do not think that most of th e kids put on ADD meds have even been to a shrink. They just go to the family Doc because Jr is acting hyper.
Logged

DrYRHead

Welcome to the rabbit hole.
Trompe Le Monde
Minimal Contributor

Offline Offline

Posts: 31


« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2009, 06:11:29 PM »

What a total propaganda piece.

Absolute utter BS.

it would be laughable, were it not the case that some people believe what fools like this have to say.


"In these cases of sudden death, the child suddenly collapses and dies, only to be discovered later by parents or siblings."   SQUIRT!


Do you folks buy this stuff?

I mean.. Obviously nobody denies that things like this are overprescribed, or that there is a profit motive in the pharmaceutical industry...

But this "naturalnews" quack wouldn't know science if it was stuffed down his throat by an alien overlord.

This guy makes me want to punch out a window
Logged

----------------------
die gedanken sind frei
----------------------
gorfehttimrek
Ultracontributor

Offline Offline

Posts: 5674


« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2009, 06:20:48 PM »

The next to last few paragraphs really do reveal the writers agenda, and it does rather stink of a pronounced BIAS.

Whether the bias is good or bad I leave for readers to decide.   The size and scope of the SPIN put on though not only approaches but goes over the fact-fiction line.  If you feel the need to Lie in order to help support or push your point; perhaps you should believe in things that you don't have to lie to people about in order to get their help.


Perhaps I need to quit    dead friggin horse    so much,


Old habits die hard,  grin
Kermit
Logged
whateveryouwantmetobe
Ubercontributor

Offline Offline

Posts: 3528


« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2009, 06:54:57 PM »

This guy makes me want to punch out a window

I get this feeling most of the time I read a "science-based" journalism article, regardless of truth or bias.  The fact is most these "reporters" don't have 1/10th the background they should to be writing articles on these topics and what they say it often misinterpreted and/or flat out wrong, so just get used to it, I guess (lots of people are going to school for journalism these days... and they don't make taking science classes part of the degree requirement).   tongue
« Last Edit: November 20, 2009, 06:56:34 PM by b » Logged
Trompe Le Monde
Minimal Contributor

Offline Offline

Posts: 31


« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2009, 08:20:32 PM »

I get this feeling most of the time I read a "science-based" journalism article, regardless of truth or bias.  The fact is most these "reporters" don't have 1/10th the background they should to be writing articles on these topics and what they say it often misinterpreted and/or flat out wrong, so just get used to it, I guess (lots of people are going to school for journalism these days... and they don't make taking science classes part of the degree requirement).   tongue
Oh I'm in full agreement that science journalism in the mainstream media is an awful state of affairs...
I certainly don't believe in "getting used to it though".
To some extent, there will always be blatant embellishments of headlines in order to attract readers.
the headline "Possible non-causal link between water consumption and number of hats, at p<.10" is not going to draw excited readers.
That will virtually always be the case as long as profit is dependent on sales or site-traffic...
But there is always the chance for improvement, as long as scientifically-literate folks increasingly call people out for their shoddy and reckless journalism..
Improvement may come slowly and seldom, but the potential is there at least  tongue


However with mr. natural news over at that site, he is a pure propagandist selling BS products and seriously endangering lives with his upside-down view of the world.
An aspiring Kevin Trudeau impersonator, no doubt..
This guy is just on a different level than an average health "writer" (more fitting title is "keyboard-masher")

Fucking germ-theory denialists..
« Last Edit: November 20, 2009, 08:22:05 PM by Trompe Le Monde » Logged

----------------------
die gedanken sind frei
----------------------
whateveryouwantmetobe
Ubercontributor

Offline Offline

Posts: 3528


« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2009, 09:01:33 PM »

chance for improvement, as long as scientifically-literate folks increasingly call people out

Hehe... great... put all the pressure to make change on us.   cheesy
Logged
Papyrifera
Loved by all
Uberator
Ubercontributor

Offline Offline

Posts: 2744


Botanist in residence


« Reply #9 on: December 06, 2009, 11:30:22 AM »

Kind of alarmist writing...
Quote
In reality, the FDA, the drug companies and the psychiatrists are all working in collusion, knowingly pushing dangerous, deadly drugs onto families for the sole purpose of generating profits. While children suffer and die, they cash in on the ADHD delusion, first by promoting a fictitious disease and then later through high-profit pharmaceutical quackery.
Yes, that's right, they are knowingly pushing dangerous deadly drugs onto families for the sole purpose of generating profits  rolleyes It's not like psychiatrists actually want to HELP anybody, you know...

That said, I agree with the main point that ritalin and dexedrine are probably not the best drugs to give to children. It points to a lack of willingness to adjust our teaching style for individual children's needs. Instead, we want to give them a pill so that they will fit into the box and learn "the way they are supposed to". I have seen many individuals prescribed such drugs, and usually by the time they hit puberty their nervous systems change. The drugs no longer have the desired effect of promoting concentration and focus, but if they go OFF the drugs then they get a nasty rebound effect where it becomes even harder for them to learn than before they started. Giving strong stimulants that we know are addictive to young children, just doesn't seem smart to me. I definately feel the double standard, where street speed or cocaine are considered such terrible, terrible drugs but pharmaceutical amphetamine and ritalin (whose mechanism of action is nearly identical to cocaine) are accepted and encouraged for many children.

I know that my grade one teacher thought I should be put on ritalin or something like it, because I wasn't learning to read as fast as the other students and she thought I had a learning disability. Luckily, my parents were smart enough to say, "How about you actually try teaching him? Your hands-off 'teaching style' is not working for my child." I learned to read on my own, a year later. Some parents these days do not even have the option of refusing medication for their own children, or at least the school will not take them back unless they are medicated. That, to me, is a great travesty.
Logged

I can say what I want to, even if I'm not serious...
I can say what I want to, even if I'm just kidding!

"The bastards are closing in, I can feel it in my blood!"
"Don't say that word around here! You'll get them excited!"
Newfound_wonder
Virus with shoes
Lycaeum Addict

Online Online

Posts: 1448


Turn on, Tune in, Take over


« Reply #10 on: December 06, 2009, 12:29:30 PM »

Ritalin has also been shown to filter out cerebral activity unrelated to solving problems so kids can focus on the task at hand.  There's a lot of crap that goes on in our heads; we get songs stuck in our heads, bad memories can play through our mind like broken records, our hopes and dreams can flow through our heads at any moment in the day.  But while one area of the brain is busy coming up with imaginative solutions to any one of our daily problems, another side of the brain is testing these ideas to verify that it the idea is a satisfactory solution to the problem at hand.

After bullshitting about brain activity, some researchers think that methylphenidate can increase the signal-to-noise ratio in the brain and decrease the amount of noise in the brain, allowing children to focus on the problems in front of them and solve them.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2291196/?tool=pmcentrez

How exactly is methylphenidate (MPD) doing this?  Hell if I know; I don't even know exactly how one neuron works, let alone how methylphenidate would alter the firing patterns of an interconnected series of neurons.  I would want to investigate why MPD can cause sudden death in children, hopefully by cellular plating means that don't involve putting children at risk. namaste

But for now; I would argue that some children could benefit from stimulant medication, and other children would not.  If a child is being hyperactive, unruly, or bored with homework, then parents should change the kid's diet, exercise, sleep, and study habits before thinking that the kid should be put on speed.  After all, good drugs are not a substitute for good parenting.  But some kids would really be better off on a little bit of speed.
Logged

Know the rules but break them, think outside the box, think for yourself.  Instead of living in a narrow-minded, linear way, live laterally, like the Fibonacci spiral; always developing, flourishing, and thriving.
pharmanimal78
Guest
« Reply #11 on: December 06, 2009, 04:05:27 PM »

Well, it certainly never hurt me.  tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

The Lycaeum exists to foster the free exchange of information on a subject that is taboo in today's world. However, there are limits to what we can discuss. No person shall post anything which discusses ongoing or future illegal activity, or which can be construed as discussing ongoing or future illegal activity. A simple guideline for appropriate posts is to always keep them impersonal and timeless. Posts which can be construed as indicating that a particular person, even if anonymous, is engaged in illegal activity will be deleted and the offending member removed. Public trading or discussion of commercial suppliers is forbidden in all forums. Do NOT ask about suppliers for any substance, legal or not. Keep posts on topic or they will be deleted. *HINT: A post regarding amphetamines within Visionary Chemicals is not on topic.

hosted by :: lycaeum.org | powered on :: centos.org

Mark All As Read

©1995 - 2010 lycaeum.org

Page created in 0.187 seconds with 22 queries.