|
"A remarkable journal by a courageous explorer, describing
travels with a broad range of psychedelic drugs. This is an
especially valuable reference volume on drug combinations."
- Alexander Shulgin, author of PIHKAL
D. M. Turner's The Essential Psychedelic Guide is often
touted as the premier guide for the advanced psychonaut. Trey's
review for the Lycaeum, for example, is certainly enthusiastic
enough in its praise. I, however, object to the tone of Turner's
accounts of his hyperspatial wanderings, and I find their implicit
intent to be exactly the opposite of what responsible users should
encourage in others and cultivate in themselves. Accordingly, I
would like to provide a rather more critical counterpoint to the
accolades "The Essential Psychedelic Guide" has received.
Turner's slim volume is not entirely without its merits. Foremost
among these is the extremely personal nature of the narrative.
Though the author prudently conceals himself behind a cleverly
chosen pseudonym, his personality and individuality are fortunately
not similarly hidden. He does not pretend to present anything more
than his own experiences and insights, which, at their best, need no
adornment. Turner also recognizes the limitations of objectivity,
particularly when self-experimenting with such powerful plants and
chemicals. Whatever science can teach us about psychedelics (and it
has already taught us an incalculable amount), it does not currently
supply the best guise in which to present Turner's investigation.
Thus Turner's book does not suffer for the fact that he makes little
attempt to corroborate his views. Nevertheless his differentiation
between the effects of LSD, psilocybin, and mescaline mirrors the
experiences of most people with this trio of psychedelics, including
myself, while mostly avoiding digressions into the implausible and
unverifiable. The ability to accurately make subjective distinctions
such as these should not be undervalued, especially since it is
claimed that these substances cannot be distinguished under
controlled conditions.
But the personal, even idiosyncratic nature of "The Essential
Psychedelic Guide" is a double-edged sword. Turner's style
occasionally degenerates from the agreeably informal to the
inappropriately casual; his writing can be irritatingly clumsy and
is rife with minor errors in grammar and usage. Turner also lets
certain annoyingly persistent prejudices creep into his book without
adequate explanation or discussion: "Natural" psychedelics
differ fundamentally from "synthetic" ones. Psychedelics
are the sine qua non of human consciousness and spiritual life.
"The Man" and his underlings conspire to suppress
psychedelics and those who use them. Psychedelics are the key to the
future. And so on.
These are, on the whole, relatively minor complaints. More
problematic is Turner's uncritical acceptance of the value of the
psychedelic experience itself. He states frequently that
psychedelics have helped him improve his life, but provides few
details. I would take Turner on faith for the sake of his anonymity
were claims like this not a recurrent problem. One of the more
seductive and subtly addicting effects of psychedelic drugs is their
ability to fill one with a sense of profound meaningfulness without
necessarily providing access to meaning itself; many who experience
the psychedelic state feel forever changed, yet rapidly sink back
into the grooves of their prior life. I fear this has happened to
Turner despite his beliefs to the contrary. But nowhere is Turner's
approach to psychedelic drugs more disturbing than his chapter on
multiple combinations. I can only speculate as to why he feels it
necessary to use such bizarre, and, to this reviewer, excessive drug
cocktails. I conclude, however, that it is more a product of boredom
and a desire to impress his readership than any quest for
self-improvement and spiritual growth. And if it is sheer intensity
of experience that one seeks, there are much simpler ways to achieve
a level 5 trip. If no one but Turner has tried mushrooms + syrian
rue + DMT + nitrous oxide + ketamine, it is because there is simply
no need. What the multiple combinations chapter reveals most
starkly, and the rest of "The Essential Psychedelic Guide"
supports is this: Turner is addicted to the psychedelic
experience--the beautiful visuals, the head trip, the sense
exploring a fantastic new world. He seeks new ways to "get
off," not because they are better, but simply because they are
different. When Turner mentions the "clear light of
reality," one has the impression he conceives of it as just
another interesting visual and has, wilfully or not, ignored the
true significance of this important Buddhist concept. He treats the
drug as an end, not a means.
For better or worse, Turner faithfully espouses the currently
fashionable psychedelic paradigm. (He does not, however, define it.
That honor belongs to Terence McKenna, whose ideas are referred to
by Turner throughout.) But the experienced psychonaut should work on
actually uncovering the reality that psychedelic experiences allow
us merely to glimpse rather than simply seeking strange new drug
combinations out of a self-indulgent desire for novelty, as Turner
is evidently content to do.
Postscript: Soon after I wrote this review, I learned of D. M.
Turner's untimely ketamine-related death. In light of this, my
admonition to refrain from rushing in, as Turner sometimes did,
where angels fear to tread, is now more imperative than ever; it is
truly sad that this lesson was made evident in a manner so tragic
and shocking. The psychedelic community has indeed lost a valued
figure, unique and colorful even in his anonynimity.
- Review by JF
The Essential Psychedelic Guide by D. M. Turner $12.95 in shops
or mail order by phone with credit card from +1 (415) 753-6481. (I
have just been sent this book, and this publicity was not
solicited.) ISBN 0-9642636-1-0, 112 pages, paperback, published by
Panther Press, 1032 Irving #514, SF, CA 94122, USA. This is the
published version of a guide called Psychedelic Explosion that
circulated over the past year in various and much re-photocopied
versions. This is unlike all the other books you have seen on drugs.
It is a consumer's guide based on the personal experiences of a
psychedelic explorer, a true connoisseur of psychedelics, written in
the first person. Anyone taking any particular psychedelic for the
first time, or intending to experiment with mixtures, will find this
book invaluable. The first DMT I tried was wasted through not
knowing how to use it; the next time I had an earlier version of
this book, followed its advice and it worked. The safety section
lists combinations to avoid, particularly MAO inhibitors and which
drugs and foods should not be taken with these. It is a surprisingly
large list including aged cheese and over ripe avocados.
"Contrary to being dangerous, throughout most of history
psychedelics h ave been considered gifts of the Gods, and have been
associated with the healing of the body, mind and soul."
Psychedelics are rated 0-10 for intensity. Ecstasy comes bottom at
2-4 while Ketamine tops the list at 10 leaving LSD, mescaline and
psilocybin in between. Though this may be true of intensity, I get
the impression that this is also the author's rating for value of
experience, and this is where I disagree. "Multiple
Combinations" is the chapter of most interest to experienced
readers. There are several described in detail, and all of them have
been tried by the author, such as LSD + Syrian Rue + DMT + Nitrous
Oxide + Cannabis which "felt absolutely beautiful". In
addition, the section on each drug includes suggestions of other
drugs to combine with it. My only criticisms are that the book
undervalues empathic drugs in favour of Ketamine which is described
as "the ultimate psychedelic journey." -Review
by Nicholas Sanders
In today's age of media hypocrisy and continual marketing
blitzkriegs, it is a startlingly infrequent occasion when one finds
something that lives up to its title. Well, friends, D.M. Turner's
(great pseudonym!) Essential Psychedelic Guide is a book that
does exactly that! Between its exquisitely fractalized covers one
will find a wealth of useful information on some of the most sought
after items on contemporary consciousness explorers' wish lists. The
deceptively slim, practically pocket-sized volume contains
fact-packed chapters on LSD, MDMA, Psilocybin, Mescaline, 2C-B, DMT
(covering N.N., its less popular cousin 5-MeO, and ayahuasca),
Harmine/Harmaline, and Ketamine. Each substance's chapter contains
excellent, accurate information on intensity (relative to each
other), history, chemistry, dosage range, effects, and compatibility
in combination with other materials, all delivered in a clear,
easy-to-read style that is refreshingly free of technical jargon.
There are also very useful chapters on psychedelic history, safety,
multiple combinations, CydelikSpace (the author's personal term for
the transpersonal realm that many of the materials discussed admit
one into), and a recommended reading list.
The real beauty of this work is that it comes straight out of the
author's first-hand experience. Turner is a psychonaut of rare
courage and adventurousness who has dared to rush in where angels
fear to tread, and his lucky readers get to share the fruits of his
explorations. His trip stories are lucid and evocative,
communicating as much as is possible within the boundaries of
written language. Especially entrancing is the Multiple Combinations
chapter, in which he details some experimental sessions that are
simply staggering to comprehend. There is information here that you
just can't get anywhere else, because I'd be willing to bet that
Turner is the only person who's tried some of these mixtures.
Another section with great narrations from experience is the chapter
on CydelikSpace, which contains some amazing reports from trips on
Ketamine combined with 2C-B that had this reviewer salivating like a
Pavlovian puppy at the thought of trying such a cocktail.
The only drawback to the book from the perspective of one
interested in visionary plants is that it concentrates mostly on
synthetic materials. With the exception of cursory mentions of
cacti, fungi, and syrian rue/b. caapi, plants are under-represented
within these pages. It would have been nice to see information on
Salvia Divinorum, as well as natural DMT sources such as the
Phalaris grasses. But then again, this wasn't intended as a fully
comprehensive work. As it stands, I would recommend this very highly
as a quick reference guide to the major entheogens. I also believe
that it would make an excellent introductory volume for someone new
to the visionary way, giving a concise summary of the information
necessary to use psychedelics safely and rewardingly.
-Review by Trey
Excerpts:
For
the Nahua the whole vegetable kingdom is constructed as inanimate
and therefore all herbs, shrubs, and trees are invariable as to
number. Grammarians say that there may be one exception:
'mushroom' is nanácatl and this could be the plural form for
nácatl, 'flesh'. Grammarians concede this much but their
discipline does not permit them to go further. I am prepared to
advance ethnomycological background supplementing the data of the
grammarians and converting what they say is, grammatically, a
possibility into virtual certainty. The sacred mushrooms, possessing
a soul, are responsible for the plural shape of nanácatl.
In many languages the mushroom vocabulary includes a generic word
for that which is eaten-'meat', 'bread', 'cheese', 'flesh', and
'food' itself. ... In Pashto, a major Indo-European language of
Afghanistan, pocekei is the name of an important edible
mushroom and that name means 'flesh', the same meaning that appears
in Nahuatl nanácatl. Of course we are not suggesting a
genetic kinship of these words with Nahuatl but when we come upon a
simple figure of speech in a mushroom vocabulary and find a parallel
association of ideas in other languages, a pattern of human thinking
begins to emerge. Nanácatl is built on nácatl, the
word in Nahuatl for 'flesh', a generic metaphor like 'food',
'victuals', 'bread', 'meat'; and by doubling the initial syllable it
assumes a pluralized form that gives to the mushroom a soul, a
status unique in the vegetable world. All mushrooms—nanácatl—are
endowed with a soul, a unique status granted to the
non-hallucinogenic species by reason of their kinship to the divine
kinds, the divine kinds dominating by their overwhelming importance
the whole fungal world. The root meaning, 'flesh', is emotionally
colorless, neutral (like eg 'meat', 'bread', 'cheese' as given
above), but it becomes exalted when the plural form—nanácatl—is
preceded by teo- or xochi-, the designation of the
entheogenic kinds.
There is a striking parallel in the Santal language, a
non-Indo-European tongue spoken by a tribe scattered in villages in
Orissa, Bihar, and West Bengal. In Santal as in Nahuatl, the whole
of the vegetable kingdom is viewed as inanimate, but in Santal there
is a startling exception: a single species of mushroom, the putka,
which is animate and being animate possesses a soul. I made a
preliminary visit to what are called the Santal Parganas in 1965 to
inquire about the putka. Again in 1968 Roger Heim from Paris
and I from New York journeyed to Orissa and Bihar for the express
purpose of studying this mushroom, which Professor Heim identified
but no one could remember why it alone of the mushroom tribe was
animate! It is not entheogenic and in the season when it abounds is
much eaten with rice. Professor Stella Kramrisch in a paper
resulting from our inquiry arrived at the etymology of putka:
not of Santal origin, it is a loan word from the Sanskrit pãtika,
the first surrogate for the Soma of the Vedic hymns, a loan word
that survives to this day only in Santal and possibly other tongues
of the Munda family. ... Thus the parallel with Nahuatl is close:
the divinity that glows in a mushroom, in each case, gives to the
mushroom a soul; in one instance (Santal) the specific kind, in the
other (Nahuatl) the whole tribe of mushrooms enbracing perhaps a
score of entheogenic species.
... Thus in the folk language certain mushrooms attract a
grammatical expression of the animism that survives from prehistory.
It is possible to offer yet another example in Russian. In the
standard language the mushroom known as the masljenik has a
special plural form, masljata, and the plural of another
mushroom name is opjata in certain uneducated circles. The plural
suffix here used is normal only with certain nouns designating young
animals, birds, and children! Clearly this personification of the
divine mushrooms is a fading survival from the time in prehistory
when the northern Slavs knew the virtues of entheogenic mushrooms.
Professor Marija Gimbutas, the renowned Lithuanian prehistorian, has
reported to us on the use down to our own day of Amanita muscaria
(ie 'Soma') in the remoter parts of Lithuania at wedding feasts and
the like when the mushrooms were mixed with vodka, and also how the
Lithuanians used to export quantities of A. muscaria to the
Lapps in the Far North for use in their shamanic practices. Here in
the Lithuanian festivities is the only report that I have so far
received of the ingestion of the fly-agaric in Eastern Europe for
jollification ends. Early Man survived longer in Lithuania than
almost anywhere else in Europe.
These parallels in unrelated languages and cultures reinforce each
other and drive home the powerful spell (sometimes reaching to
divinity) that the entheogenic mushrooms cast over diverse peoples
in prehistory. (pages 42-44)
CSP's
Entheogen
Chrestomathy entry for The Psychedelic Guide
Submit
a review of your own
|